Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Investing in China: I

I have talked about investing in China many times in this blog. Recently a good friend of my wife asked this question: how to protect her parents retirement (life style) now that they are near retirement?

I think this is a very good question, also a very common one. Recently I read Charlie Munger's book Poor Charile's Almanac, and he said three stocks are enought (diversified) if they are good stocks and the person trully understands it. I agree.

So, let me apply this three stocks approach and run a hypertheoritical portfolio for my wife's friend ('s parents :-)

The first stock comes to mind is 601628.SS, China Life Insurance (NYSE: LFC; HKSE: 2628.HK). I talked China Life couple times, during its Shanghai IPO (secondary offering to be precise), and "Got Yuan" post. I believe China Life is uniquely positioned to take advantage of weakened competitors (China Ping'An and AIG China subsidiary), and this down market.

China Life Insurance logo

The second stock is 601398.SS, ICBC (Industrial and Commercial Bank of China) (1398.HK). To be continued...

Reference: AH share difference

Monday, May 25, 2009

Buffett bets on Wells, US Bancorp

From Yahoo Tech-ticker.



I don't know about Wells, but I have US Bancorp shares (NYSE: USB). The stock appears expensive if you look at the price book ratio, which is a common metric to measure bank stocks. But USB is a very different bank compared to others, it's a conservative lender. Since I opened my checking account with USB a few weeks ago, I had opportunity to visit the branch, it's clean, and looks much sharp then the Bank of America branches I visited. Maybe, USB could get some deposit base from B of A, amid all the controversies around B of A. The USB stock was obviously knocked down last week due to secondary offering (raise money to repay TARP, or to get out of TRAP to be more precise). Today it got a nice bump from Buffett endorsement.

Reference: gurufocus Buffett buy.

Wuxi Apptec WX Q1 2009 update

(Update May 19) Sold out my WX positions. I had a second thought on the stock.

(Original) Formerly Wuxi Pharma Tech, the name change was to reflect the US based Apptec acquisition a year ago.

I have bought and sold WX a few times since its IPO in 2007 (Wuxi Pharma Tech looking good; Got some WX again; Wuxi Pharma continues to drop). I sold out my WX position last Sept. (shortly before Lehman's fall). I decided to got back some WX again about 10 days ago. A few things have changed since last update:

1) Since Wuxi cancelled the secondary offering last May, the selling shareholder UOB sold shares to private equity firm Warburg Pincus.

2) WX had to wrote down a large portion of good will because buying Apptec at the wrong time (pulled trigger too earlier).

3) The US big pharma(s) are under more political pressure to provide cheaper drugs (healthcare reform), face patent expiration (e.g. Liptor for Pfizer), and unhappy shareholders (because of dismal return of stocks in recent years). They had to cut back in R&D in some cases.

Despite all that, Wuxi delivered a solid quarter in Q1 2009 (IR web site). The CRO (Contract Research Organization) outsourcing is a big market (about $14 billion in 2006) and still growing. In the near future the western big pharmas will still be the main customers for Wuxi. This reminds me of the IT outsourcing in India, where the demand is mostly from the western developed economies. So the main question is can Wuxi hold its place (about $265 to $275 million) amid all these competitors (west or China/India based service providers)? I don't have a conclusive answer, but here are some of Wuxi's advantages:

1) Scale, talent and cost: not the biggest compared to the industry big player, but it's the No. 1 in China, supply of talent in China is ample. There are other Chinese outsourcing companies, but they are smaller and they did not get opportunity to raise money from capital market. The cost of doing business in China is rising too, but still much cheaper compared to the west;

2) Management: Dr. Ge Li and some of his people have extensive US pharma experience and good relationships with them;

3) Stock price: even after Friday 40% jump, the stock is traded at about twice the revenue of 2008/9 (P/S = 528/270 = 2).

Disclosure: hold WX shares as of this writing.

Appendix: The CRO Market Outlook: Emerging Markets, Leading Players And Future Trends
Key findings of the report...
The total CRO market size is estimated at $14bn in 2006 and expected to grow at an annual rate of 14-16% to reach $24bn through 2010. The market is highly fragmented and the number of CROs worldwide has reached over 1,100 despite continued consolidation.
CROs provide substantial global capacity to drug developers and have become critical contributors to clinical trial activity. Clinical trials conducted by CROs are completed up to 30% more quickly than those conducted in-house by pharma companies.
Of the large, global contract research providers, Quintiles is market leader, with 14% of the global market share, followed by Covance and PPD, holding 10% each. The five largest CROs have increased their market share and now hold 45% of the total market.
The leading CROs are commodity full service providers operating on a global scale. They act as one-stop shops for all services, from preclinical through marketing.
CROs and pharmaceutical companies are turning to strategic partnerships to gain a competitive edge in the global business environment.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Is somebody watching Federal Reserve?

The answer is "Not Really".



First saw the video from trader1688.

Quote: 简单写几句小结:


这是5/5/2009的一个hearing的片段。当事双方是Rep. Alan Grayson和Federal Reserve Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman。
这个grayson似乎还略有正义感,问的问题是fed的balance sheet。几个trillion的钱去了哪里,借给了谁,有些什么样的监控措施。leh breakdown, 还有fed自己的几个t的 off balance sheet obligations.

Coleman 就纯粹是捣糨糊。注意她的几个关键词,
1. high level review ... but not audit = 不想知道(level越high,可信度越低)
2. in progress since last september = 不知道,(半年多还查不到10t的动态?)
3. jurisdiction = 不归我管
她的回答就是一个复杂版的 i don't know, and i don't track the money.


grayson的结论是 i am shocked to find out nobody in the federal reserve including the inspector general is tracking of this.
(继续旁白ing: greyson啊,去学学中国的厚黑学,shock什么啊,你会习惯的。当然了如果你想借题发挥,拉选票的话,小心俺们人民群众黑了你。)

US Bancorp share looks cheap

(Update) According to Dow Jones News, USB sold 139 million shares at $18 per share. See the news at WSJ.

(Original) When I say cheap, I meant in relative terms.

US Bank logo

My benchmark: Buffett endorsed 2 banks in Berkshire annual shareholder meeting: US Bank (NYSE: USB) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC). Many people did not know current Wells Fargo is not the good old Wells Fargo in the west coast, a little more than 10 years ago Norwest and Wells Fargo merged, and adopted the Wells name. Ok, back to the topic. Both USB and WFC stocks had a fun ride in the last 12 months. But more interestingly, as of today, WFC is down 5% YoY, while USB is down 42%. In the past 12 months a lot things have happened to Wells, the biggest one being the Wachovia acqusition. Both took TARP money. Both issued common stocks: twice for Wells (last Fall and last week), once fot USB (today). But the purpose of issing stocks is slightly different: Wells needed the money for captial, USB needs the money to pay back TARP.

Notice the difference here? While Wells is still working hard to prop up capital required by regulator, USB is preparing pay back the TARP. That tells the fiscal strength of the company.

PS, got the $75 from US bank for the new checking account. Also, the customer representative called back to see if I am happy.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Random thoughts on Berkshire annual meeting weekend

(Update 04May09) Buffett CNBC interview. (Monday Becky Quick)













I did not go to the Berkshire annual shareholder meeting, partly because of the recession (cost cutting), partly because I sold the stock recently (note: one does not have to buy stock to get the admission ticket, they sell it at $5 on eBay). There are live blog and twitter on the meeting (6 hours Q&A), such as MarketBeat (WSJ), CNBC BuffettWatch and NY Times Andrew Sokin. But there are no webcast, because Warren and Charlie are old fashioned.

Succession plan
I have no doubt Buffett and the board have great plan and good people in line to take over if something happen to Warren. But let's be honest, Warren is 79 years old, we know he lives a much healthy live style than Chairman Mao, but I don't expect he run this thing for 20 more years (as said by David Sokol yesterday). The real problem is: nobody can replace Warren, 2 persons or more combined (Warren's idea of a CEO, and a few investment managers) can make things more complicated. Who is going to make the investment call then: use latest example, the Constellation Energy acquisition decision is made in one day between Warren and Sokol. When new guys come in, can we expect that kind of coordination? If conflicts happen, who is going to be middleman and impose influence? Bill Gates seems like a logical choice. As matter of fact he pledged to be a guardian of Berkshire recently. He got the ownership (as Warren pledged majority of Berkshire stock to Bill Gates Foundation).

Recent Buffett investment decisions
Basically Warren did a few big 10% yield preferred stock deal. Many people cried he overpaid for the Goldman and GE stock, he did not (he got the warrants priced at $115 for Goldman, and $22.25 for GE). But here is my rationale why he did the 10% deal: he must think 10% yield is good considering the risk. We know in the past Berkshire annual return is more than 20%, but now Warren is satisfied with 10% yield. As the ship get larger, it's increasingly difficult to speed up.

Another reason (I think), he want to use up some of the cash (more than $40 billion in early 2008), in case his health situation goes bad, some new guy comes in and does some dumb thing.

Common traits of 4 horseman
Amazon, Apple, Google and Research in Motion. All have founders are still making the call. Interestingly, Bill Gates is still the biggest shareholder of Microsoft, but he is not actively engaged. One reason the stock did not do anything in last 10 years?

Will Newspapers go away one day?

I remember a few years ago Warren expressed his dismal view on Newspapers future (in his annual shareholder letter). A few days ago Redstone (the controlling shareholder of CBS and Viacom) said something similar in an interview.

"The reason we have not gone to newspapers is because its a slow growth industry and I think they are dying. I'm not sure there will be newspapers in 10 years. I read newspapers every day. I even read Murdoch's Wall Street Journal."

I am a newspaper reader. I subcribed to Barrons and WSJ (paper format). Both my wife and I preferred the paper format, because we can mark on it, and it seems to me I think more when read something on paper (vs. computer). Lately I am seeing some interesting phenomena: the WSJ gets thinner and thinner; sometimes I did not receive the paper.

Business problem of newspapers
Newspaper business was caught in a perfect storm in my mind: as more people get news online (via a piece of paper), Google Ads and web advertising in general is taking away a lot of advertising dollar from traditional print media (newspaper and magazine); auto and housing sectors, which made up a large piece of newspaper Ad pie, are losing money left and right; last year the soaring of commodity cost (from oil to paper) with declining subscriptions, increased the cost of running a newspaper. Other costs, hiring journalists, and labor union are pretty much fixed cost for the newspapers. Also keep in mind, many newspapers had large debt, which put them into undesirable position in this credit crunch (I remember Chicago Tribue filed bankrupcy a few month ago).

How about the online business of newspaper? After all, they can do the display ads or google ads themselves, right? But in this area, they are no longer the local monopoly. Basically they serve as an agent or a distributor for Google (double click) or Yahoo.

What's the future for newspaper?
I cannot imagine the days without newspaper. Maybe I am too old fashioned. Remember 10 years ago we all used landline phone. Now almost all of us go mobile. We can get news from Google, Yahoo or MSN.

Also, if some newspapers survive (in the cyberspace), maybe we can get them from iPhone or Amazon Kindle? Save the trouble for printing/delivery?

Stock misconception: listen to experts

A guranteed way to lose money: listen to so-called experts. Barrons is a pretty reputable magazine in investment community. I read them, but I don't listen to them. Here is an example: the reporting card of Barrons Roundtable 2008. Every year (Jan) Barrons will assembly a group of experts, from famous money managers to analysts such as Bill Gross (Pimco) to Abey Cohen (Goldman Sachs), discussing the outlook of the year, and each expert will share some picks.

Here is an example how things go terribly wrong (I hope no one copied his strategy).

ARCHIE MacALLASTER'S Picks

PRICE
Company Ticker 1/4/08 12/31/08 Change
Fidelity National Information Svc ** FIS $39.87 $16.27 -22.2%
Hanmi Financial HAFC 7.44 2.06 -72.3
Bank of America BAC 39.85 14.08 -64.7
Lincoln National LNC 54.67 18.84 -65.5
VeriFone Holdings PAY 18.50 4.90 -73.5
Chesapeake Energy CHK 39.32 16.17 -58.9
Hartford Financial HIG 82.95 16.42 -80.2

And another one
ART SAMBERG'S Picks

PRICE
Company Ticker 1/4/08 12/31/08 Change
Ultra Petroleum UPL $71.81 $34.51 -51.9%
MEMC Electronic Materials WFR 81.40 14.28 -82.5
Qualcomm QCOM 37.03 35.83 -3.2
Focus Media FMCN 55.71 9.09 -83.7
Dogan Yayin DYHOL.Turkey 4.44 TRL 0.66 TRL -85.1
America Movil AMX $58.44 $30.99 -47.0
Brazilian Home Builders
Brascan Res. Prop BISA3.Brazil 11.25 BRL 2.47 BRL -78.0
Gafisa GFA $34.59 $9.26 -73.2

Monday, May 11, 2009

Stock misconception: volatility is not always bad

We often from financial experts that volatility in our portfolio is bad. Or in other words, not only do we want good return, but we also want the path to that is smooth. I think most people would agree with that. My CFA preparation book also talked about this idea in "Portfolio Management" section. So basically this "less volatility" is preached and accepted in investment community.

But in Poor Charlie's Almanac, Charlie challenged that less volatility notion and I think I agreed with him. Bascially he was arguing that this is very similar to (in old days) the Chinese women tied their feet, obviously that would not help them walking.

In another instance, volatility is good for the investment banks in this past Q1, as they made a lot of money selling the bonds (wider spead yield). I think they made money from selling stock options too (more volatility, more expensive the options).

For me personally, I am still learning about this volatility thing. Like "buy and hold", I need to get out of this old habbit of "less volatility bias". In late March I bought some Patroit Coal (NYSE: PCX), but I sold it after 2 days after it went up then down. Today the stock traded about 80% above what I bought :-(

Appendix: Think outside the box
George Soros is the total opposite to Buffett and Munger in terms of stock trading style. Nevertheless, we can learn a thing or two from this another greate speculator. Watch Yahoo Tech-ticker

Reading Poor Charlie's Almanac

(Update 04May09) CNBC interview.














(Update 01May09) Today PBS Nightly Business Report (NBR) Susie Ghalib interviewed Charlie Munger at Omaha.

(Original) One lesson I should learn from him: trade less.

Poor Charlie's Almanac pic

Two reasons:

1) Transaction cost;

2) One usually makes money from carefully selected bets.

Separately I noticed Berkshire Hathaway stock (NYSE: BRK.A; BRK.B) got a nice bump today, as we approaching the annual shareholder meeting at Omaha. This is typically as I recall last year the stock got a nice bump before the meeting, and then had a sell off.

Disclosure: I no longer hold BRK.B shares. Personally I don't feel I understand the insurance business, and the risk of succession is real. Although Bill Gates pledged he will help preserve the culture of Berkshire (Bloomberg, notice there is also a video).

I thought about attending the meeting (couple months ago), but my idea was shot down by my wife :D

PBS NewsHour doing weekly series on Saint Louis

(Originally written on Apr 28) Yesterday was series one. The series is about the new stimulus package, economy and comparison of (1930s) new deal with current stimulus package. The first one showed many St. Louis landmark, such as St. Louis zoo, Forest Park (Jewel Box). I did not know many of those were built in 1930s (the New Deal).

StreamVideo link here.

It's said that President will be here for a Townhall tomorrow (Wednesday), to get some feedback for his first 100 days. Suddenly, St. Louis is under spotlight.

Here is a link to "recent programs" at PBS NewsHour.

Thursday, April 30, 2009

Is 401k a scam?

As millions of American workers saw their 401k became 201k since last year, this 401k thing suddenly becomes a hot topic. CBS 60 minutes did an excellent report on this topic.


Watch CBS Videos Online

My thoughts
We can not put all blame to the wall street and the market meltdown (whether they caused it or not). It appears to me as the American baby boomers approaching retirement, some of them sold their mutual fund in their 401k accounts when they saw market crash. On the other hand...

Mutual fund industry grew (and benefited) significantly from the boom of 401k in last 30 years. The "buy and hold" strategy mostly worked well both for employers (cutting pension cost) and money managers. But it only "appears" worked for employees because their gain is mostly on paper before this downturn. Besides "buy and hold" and tax deferral advantages, we were told:

1) Stocks have out performed bonds/money market by a few percentage points in a long tim horizon. This is meaningless if our stock mutual funds got hit while we "hold";

2) Dollar average cost, meaning put some amount of money each month. Looking back we now know if we "dollar average cost" in last 10 years and invested in S&P500 index, we actually lost money.

I think the lesson for us is not to blame the greedy wall street or Vanguard, we should rather educate ourselves more on 401k, and perhaps come up with a better strategy. One thing I will do is:

If ( I >= 65 years old)
{
I will switch some money from stock funds to bond/money market funds;
}
Else
{
Thinking new strategy now...
}

Rosetta Stone, learning foreign language

First saw Rosetta Stone at the mall couple years ago (the kiosk). More recently saw its Ads on the TV. Today comes a monumental day for the company (bloomberg news, IPOHome, Yahoo Finance), the IPO (as old Warren says IPO stands for its probably overpriced).

Fun and emotion aside, I think this language thing may stick. Before Rosetta Stone, the other public company does language training I know of is New Oriental (NYSE: EDU). New Oriental has harnessed the Chinese market in a very unique way, and it's now the un-disputed leader in English test training in China. The main reason? Basically without the training from New Oriental, normal Chinese students can not score high in the TOEFL and GRE (notice I said normal, certainly I understand there are some exceptional Chinese students, and I happened to meet a few back in college). At the time I took TOEFL and GRE, New Oriental school has not existed in my city, so I took training from the best alternative: Qianjing college. Anyway, they serve similar purposes.

I have not used Rosetta Stone service yet. Nor do I plan to learn another foreign language (English is hard enough for me). But I know there is huge demand in this area. Chinese (mandarin) and Spanish are two popular ones. As matter of fact, my wife has been teaching madarin to some college students and little kids, and she has been enthusiatically studying Spanish and Cantonese these days. I joked with her why not learn Cantonese while at Hongkong (she studied there for one year).

Learning and grasping a foreign language well is hard. I mean, things beyond "good morning", "thank you" (if you count that, I know at least 2 more languages). Any tools making this process easier will be welcome by eager learners. From business perspective "cannot pour foreign language into human's brain" is a good thing (hint: look at fitness club). Also it appears to me, bi-lingual people are in increasing demand in both the business and non-for-profit world. The recent worldwide economy slowdown won't affect that. On the contary, the recession shows the imbalance of world economy (too much consumption in the US, too much export from Asia). In the next 10 to 20 years we should see China, Brazil, India and other emerging economies produce and consume more, while US and Western Europe lose some share of world GDP. Hopefully this will also better balancing the world economy and prevent world economy from meltdown like this one.

So, for the sake of world economy, maybe I should learn Spanish with my wife :-)

Stock lessons: sold the goose too early

This is typically what happens, shortly after I sold a stock, it becomes golden goose. This can be best exampified by the US Bank stock (NYSE: USB). I bought some yesterday afternoon shortly before close. But I kind got a buyer remorse, thought my $16.50 price is a bit high. More importantly, I don't know how financial stocks will go up and down as the earnings started roll out (WFC, GS), and the stock offering of Goldman. I am also unsettled by the charts: by looking at USB/WFC/JPM etc. at stockcharts.com, it appears to me the bank stocks are topping (higher price, lower volume). So I became nervous and sold it this morning, at $16.78. Shortly after that, USB took off, it closed at $17.89. In other words, I missed the potential gain, again :-(


(Video from Yahoo Tech-ticker)

Traders' market
Made quite a few trades lately. As I read from WSJ, and watched from Yahoo Tech-ticker, this is a trader's market. Financial stocks (banks, insurers, even asset managers such as T. Rowe Price) went up and down, as the news on Mark to market, uptick rule, Public Private Investment Partnership and most recently thw Q1 earning came out.

But when I examine the transaction fee, profit and loss. I am still at a loss this year. The biggest loss is from BRK.B :-(

Lesson learned
Other recent instances I sold a stock too early: STP and PCX. I sold STP when it started to run, at $11.76, it now trades at $14.64. As to PCX, I became nervous again and locked in small profit at $3.93 (at the days' low), it now trades at $4.49 (after its big brother BTU big drop today).

1) Patience, more patience, esp. in this volatile market. There are many opprortunites, as long as we are patient and open minded;

2) Talking about open mind. I was debating between myself about selling USB stocks since last night. I did remove the limit sell order early morning, but I put it back on shortly, and obviously sold it way too early (changed from $17.98 to $16.78). Need to adjust as the situation changes.

3) On a positive note, I did not sell it in low $16 at the beginning of trading hour, which is exactly how I did with WFC couple month ago.

Friday, April 24, 2009

Buffett NRG Energy average cost

From gurufocus, we can see investor gurus like Buffett's buy and sell actions, usually 45 after the close of a quarter. NRG Energy is an interesting one, because it's going to build the first nuclear power plant in the US for 30 years, and the offer Exelon put up last Oct. (0.485 share of Exelon for each share of NRG). More interestingly, Buffett's Berkshire started buying NRG since last year. Here is the transactions: http://www.gurufocus.com/StockBuy.php?action=buy&GuruName=Warren+Buffett

2Q 08: $42.40 * 3,280,100 = 139,076,240
3Q 08: $35.50 * (5,000,000 - 3,280,100) = 61,056,450
4Q 08: $21.50 * 2,200,000 = 47,300,000

By my calculation average cost Buffett paid for NRG is 247,432,690/7,200,000 = $34.3657

Buying a stock Buffett was buying gives one some comfort because Buffett usually did his homework, and adhere to his rules (business; moat; management; price etc). Buying a stock at discount of the price Buffett paid offers some margin of safety. BTW, NRG closed at $18.33 today, about 50% of the Buffett price :-)

Downside
The main downside of NRG is more than 50% of shareholders already accepted the tend offer from Exelon (they surrendered). Exelon extends tend offer till June 26. So hold on the stocks, just like the Oralce of Omaha does.

My view on Credit Cards: from both sides

(Update 23Apr09) It seems Obama administration is going to make credit card more consumer friendly (marketWatch). So are they going to socialize the credit card: I mean, you and me (i.e., honest guys) pay the credit cards on time each month, will bail out the deadbeats, after we bailed out the Wall Street ??? We know the credit card companies (the wall street) are not charities. This thing looks more like dumber and dumber.

(Original) Yesterday I mentioned credit card when talking about recurring revenue. Credit card is the live blood of our consumer society. Like commerical paper for business, we (consumers) use (more precisely borrow from) credit card for our daily purchases. At the end of each billing period, we either pay off the whole balance or pay the minimum payment (not recommended from personal finance perspective, but so many people do this nowadays. The customers who carry balance (and pay >10% interest) also contribute the profit of credit card companies. But it appears now credit card companies started to upset their best customrers, amid the credit crisis.

Business
American Express (NYSE: AXP) and Citibank (NYSE: C) pay customer to go away

JP Morgan Chase (NYSE: JPM) charged monthly fee to customers, then gave refund under pressure from NY AG Cuomo (CNN Money story).

Last but not least, B of A (NYSE: BAC) raises interest and minimum payment for accounts with balance. Actually all credit cards do this (Card issuers: raise interest for everyone). JPM raised my minimum payment from 2% of balance to 5% of balance recently.

The main reason credit card do this is not to upset their best customers, but rather as the unemployment rises, credit card default also rises, the card companies need to raise the rate to offset the rising default. As we all know, card companies are not in the business of charity, they lend so that they can make money (from us :-)

Consumer
My tips: separate the cash bonus card (the card one pays off each month) from balance transfer card (hopefully low interest). For me I learned this lesson back in 2000. Also pay miminum payment for the BT card which has a low interest rate until it paid off. This is mostly to raise more cash in this uncertain economy. Acutally Suze Orman, the famous conservative personal finance author recently also recommend "pay minimum", while I have done this already for years. Here is Suze's original word:

"If you have an unpaid credit card balance [and] not much saved up in emergency savings, I need you to listen up. My advice has changed. I want you to only pay the minimum due on your credit card balance, and instead, make it your top priority to build as much of an emergency cash fund as you can"

Big picture
I don't expect the credit card to ease credit in the near term. As the economy continues in recession, one interesting phoenomena is now every card don't want to be the last guy to hold hot potato: means they cut credit limit to card members to avoid they hold the last balance transfer from other cards.

Read this Meredith Whitney WSJ 031109 article: Credit card the next credit crunch, if you have some 20 minutes to spend.

Google Finance stock screener

(Update 20Apr09) Found this trick in google finance (chart), hold on mouse "up" or "down", the time frame of stock chart extends or contracts.

Stock Screener
Here is an example: market cap $5 b to 25 b; PE ratio 10 to 20; dividend yield 2% to 5%; return on equity 15% to 25% (last 5 years). You can also sort the results by "52 week price change" etc (in ascending or descending order).

Customization: you can add other criteria such as "Return on equity (ave. last 5 years)". The reason I like return on equity is that it means real return for shareholders. Ideally I am more intereted in the free cash flow yield (definition at investopedia).

Range: Google provides default. You can see the price change for all the stocks: -99.86% to 5,094% (52 weeks). Interesting. I left it here so I can see the range (in other words, I am not filtering out any stocks using this criteria).

Results: there are 27 stocks as I ran this in recent days. I found ADP, BNI, TROW, GWW to be interesting.

Another screen: switch to smaller captial (1b to 5b), div yield 1% to 4%, added revenue growth 10% to 20% (last 5 years, match PE 10 to 20). Here is the link. It gives me 10 stocks.

At this time, I mostly use it for fun. I am not seriously use it to pick a stock, yet.

Industry
My complaints on Google Finance. A bit strange, why is Wells Fargo a regional bank, while US bank a money center bank?
Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) belongs to Regional Banks

US Bank (NYSE: USB) belongs to Money Center Banks

PS, I remember years ago I used Yahoo Finance java based stock screener. But here is its web based Stock Screener.

PS2, long time ago GSeeker wrote this about Google Finance (in Chinese).